Scapegoating in contemporary culture reveals a deeper failure not only in public discourse but in the way research and foresight are practiced. When societies assign blame to symbolic targets such as migrants, youth, AI, or academic institutions, they often reflect a broader discomfort with complexity, ambiguity, and systemic accountability. These patterns of blame are not merely sociopolitical but point to a crisis in how knowledge is produced and applied. Traditional foresight practices that rely heavily on linear trends, quantifiable data, and sanitized narratives fail to account for the emotional, symbolic, and narrative dimensions of collective behavior. To move forward, research must evolve into a layered, participatory practice that includes cultural semiotics, affective insight, and plural perspectives. Only by treating scapegoats as meaningful signals of what societies cannot process can foresight become a tool not just for prediction, but for understanding and transformation.
--------
19:31
--------
19:31
Rethinking the Unknowns
In the wake of this weekend’s strike on Iran, the urgency to reassess how we understand uncertainty is clear. Strategic decisions are often driven by what appears to be missing, yet the real blind spots may lie in how meaning is constructed and perceived. A mixed-method approach that combines scenario planning, cultural analysis, and psychological models like the Johari Window offers a more complete way to navigate complexity. It moves beyond filling data gaps and instead focuses on understanding the narratives, identities, and emotions that shape global events.
--------
16:01
--------
16:01
Measuring the Irrationality of Culture
Cultural behavior rarely follows a straight line. What looks irrational on the surface often reflects deeper emotional logics, shifting norms, and emergent values. This piece explores how strategic foresight can move beyond binary thinking to recognize ambiguity as a key signal, not a flaw in the system. Using a Bayesian framework, it highlights how patterns like solo living, intragenerational tension, and hybrid urban resistance offer measurable insights into how culture is evolving. Rather than seeking clarity too quickly, the analysis embraces contradiction, showing how foresight becomes stronger when it listens more carefully to what doesn’t fit. GenAI plays a supporting role in surfacing these subtleties, helping to track meaning where logic alone falls short
--------
18:56
--------
18:56
Foresight as Augmented Memory
In a world increasingly shaped by GenAI, memory becomes an active tool for understanding, not just a static archive of the past. Rather than offering linear predictions, GenAI helps us uncover forgotten narratives, buried assumptions, and long patterns that still influence the present. It allows us to reorganize history across multiple timescales, revealing how emotional resonance, environmental shifts, and cultural habits converge in ways we often overlook. This turns foresight into more than a forward-looking practice. It becomes a form of intentional remembrance, prompting us to ask which stories we carry, which we silence, and how those choices shape what comes next.
--------
5:46
--------
5:46
Revealing Implicit Cultural Domains
In a world focused on logic and optimization, the real forces shaping our future often exist beneath the surface in the quiet codes of culture. From the design of suburban lawns to the voices of digital assistants, everyday elements carry hidden narratives. These implicit cultural domains are not random; they are inherited and deeply influential. Understanding them calls for intelligence that sees contradiction as meaning and uses that insight to design futures grounded in both human complexity and cultural truth.
Polska